[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#475509: marked as done (Broken link on S/390 port page)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:19:07 +0100
with message-id <47ff654b.bQ5UKu/+oB1ddis0%mjr@phonecoop.coop>
and subject line Re: Bug#475509: Broken link on S/390 port page
has caused the Debian Bug report #475509,
regarding Broken link on S/390 port page
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
475509: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475509
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

The "Web portal" link on http://www.debian.org/ports/s390/ is broken -- 
its target http://www.trustsec.de/deb390/ no longer exists.

-- 
Moray

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Moray Allan <moray@debian.org> wrote:
> The "Web portal" link on http://www.debian.org/ports/s390/ is broken -- 
> its target http://www.trustsec.de/deb390/ no longer exists.

web.archive.org last saw that postnuke site last August.  No
announcement that it was moving or similar that I could see.
Paragraph has been commented out in CVS.  Marking this as "done".

Thank you for your help in improving debian's website.
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct



--- End Message ---

Reply to: