Bug#468765: Is oldstable security support duration something to be proud of?
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I reported #468765 about a questionable statement on www.debian.org. Frank
> Lichtenheld wants this to be discussed.
> This statement is in a security announcement. Martin Schulze confirmed that he
> wrote the statement. Does the security team think that oldstable security
> support duration is something to be proud of?
Why would anyone question if a security support of at *least* 2,5 years
by volunteers not be something to be proud of?
If people think the duration of the security support is more important
than the quality of the support, then that question could indeed be