Am Donnerstag, den 27.12.2007, 21:47 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes: > Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > I guess I have not been clear enough about the problem. > > The announcement says this: > > "You can use A or B." > > B being a library used by A, users have to use B anyway, the only choice is to > > use A or not. Actually, the choice is which APT front-end to use. > No, it's not, apt is a package manager, it's libapt that is a library. > Sorry, but you're wrong. No, apt-get is the package manager - apt is the general concept. There is no binary named apt, and this is what Pilippe is on about, and IMHO rightfully. HTH, Rhonda
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil