Bug#431105: marked as done (information on packages.{,qa.}debian.org is outdated)
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2007 21:03:19 +0200
with message-id <20070902190319.GC21711@dirac.djpig.de>
and subject line Should be better now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: information on packages.{,qa.}debian.org is outdated
- From: Joachim Reichel <joachim.reichel@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:13:36 +0200
- Message-id: <20070629191336.5639.55463.reportbug@enterprise-e>
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
(There is no packages.d.o pseudo-package. Please reassign if www.d.o is not appropriate.)
The information shown on packages.d.o is outdated. For example,
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=cgal&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
shows version 3.2.1-2, but version 3.3-1 entered the archive four days ago.
packages.qa.debian.org is also out of date. All information in the left
column refers to 3.2.1-2 as the newest version, while the right column is
aware of version 3.3-1.
Regards,
Joachim
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Should be fixed and hopefully stay fixed due to recent improvements
to the code.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--- End Message ---
Reply to: