On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > I am in the progress of translating the etch errata into Romanian (yes I > > know, better late then never) and I noticed that apt-get is still used > > in the example for security updates. I thought aptitude was the > > recommended frontend. > > In the case of security updates, it does not matter, because there are no > complex dependencies to be resolved, you only upgrade existing packages and > there should be no difference which program is used. My point was that we should have consistent recommendations. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature