Bug#298759: www.debian.org: "Why Debian" page contains paragraph that seems dated
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 05/27/2006 11:04 AM, Florian Ludwig wrote:
> it looks okay to me cause the second sentence "NT and XP have shown
> themselves to be very bad also". Although if we mention windows 95 we
> should also mention 98 instead of skipping it.
> Otherwise i would mark this bug as "will not fixed" if nobody disagree.
> Florian Ludwig
Maybe we could rephrase the sentence for something like:
Windows 95 has essentially no security. Later versions (including
Windows 98/Me) and more recent ones (NT and XP) have shown
themselves to be very bad also.
Probably it will need some review because I'm a non-native speaker.
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----