[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:48 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:

> Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT
> license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A
> custom license is not something that we want to write, and especially
> not without serious thought and consideration between people who have
> a great deal of experience in writing licenses.
> Contributing to license proliferation by a license which is not
> compatible with the GPL and some other free software licenses is not
> something that we want to do.

Thank you for saying that before I could get around to it, Don.  I
strongly agree.


Reply to: