* Jutta Wrage <jw@witch.westfalen.de> [2006-02-15 10:30]:
> Am 14.02.2006 um 23:37 schrieb Gerfried Fuchs:
>> Should we supress the addition of width="102" height="60" to the HTML
>> output?
>
> Please do not remove the size! It is needed to display the image
> correctly and the browser will try to calculate the size itself if
> not present. That will give serious problems with rendering and
> layout issues.
I know that. Though, it is written like this:
#v+
The suggested maximum size for your logo is 120x60.
#v-
This is absolutely against the status quo, because it has in the html
page 102x60.
I'll do two commits then, one changing from 120 to 102 (and bumping the
translation-check header), and a second commit that changes the text
like this:
#v+
-The suggested maximum size for your logo is 120x60.
+The size of the logo is 102x60; if your logo is smaller please pad it
+with a transparent border, otherwise it would get stretched ugly.
#v-
I'll be doing so tomorrow if no reply is coming.
Furthermore I suggest to use content negotiation for the logo file,
only use <img src="sponsor_img"> and let the server find the right one.
That way the mirrors have no problem using .png, .gif or whatever image
format they prefer, without renaming a .png to .jpg...
That is something that might need the addition of the size directly
into the template because wml can't find the image then itself.
I guess there shouldn't be too much things that speak against that
change, too?
So long,
Alfie
--
To err is human -- but it feels divine.
-- Mae West
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature