Bug#302739: marked as done (www.debian.org: doc/reference § 2.1.3 says sarge=stable)
Your message dated Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
with message-id <20050403191819.GA7130@pluto>
and subject line Bug#302739: =?iso-8859-1?Q?www=2Edebia?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2Eorg=3A_doc=2Freference_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 18:05:18 +0000
>From master@tofu.mamane.lu Sat Apr 02 10:05:18 2005
Return-path: <master@tofu.mamane.lu>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHmzm-0005WU-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:05:18 -0800
Received: from 213-84-114-29.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.114.29]
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DHmzk-0005sk-00; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:05:17 -0700
Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DHmwg-0005ti-Ad
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:02:06 +0200
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:02:06 +0200
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: =?iso-8859-15?Q?doc=2Frefe?=
=?iso-8859-15?Q?rence_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050402180206.GA22244@tofu.mamane.lu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html, section
2.1.3 says that sarge is the current stable, which is rather confusing
for people not up to date with Debian news.
--
Lionel
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302739-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 19:18:38 +0000
>From tux-master@web.de Sun Apr 03 12:18:38 2005
Return-path: <tux-master@web.de>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIAcI-0001vt-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 12:18:38 -0700
Received: from [217.2.130.32] (helo=localhost)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.104 #268)
id 1DIAbn-0001j0-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:18:07 +0200
Received: from jens by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DIAbz-0001rN-RG; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 21:18:19 +0200
From: Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net>
To: 302739-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#302739: =?iso-8859-1?Q?www=2Edebia?=
=?iso-8859-1?Q?n=2Eorg=3A_doc=2Freference_=A7?= 2.1.3 says sarge=stable
Message-ID: <20050403191819.GA7130@pluto>
References: <[🔎] 20050402180206.GA22244@tofu.mamane.lu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050402180206.GA22244@tofu.mamane.lu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: tux-master@web.de
X-Sender: tux-master@web.de
Delivered-To: 302739-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 08:02:06PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-system.en.html, section
> 2.1.3 says that sarge is the current stable, which is rather confusing
> for people not up to date with Debian news.
Thanks for this report.
I changed the DDP version to use Woody for stable, but please note that
this will be overridden with the next synchronisation from SourceForce
CVS (project name: qref). This is because we prepare a new version
and deb packages for Sarge and we need of course to mention Sarge as the
stable release so that it can migrate to Sarge.
Jens
Reply to: