Hello,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:50:49AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:06 AM, Helge Kreutzmann
> <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
>
> > Package: www.debian.org
> > Version: N/A; reported 2005-01-18
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > I wanted to look at the RC bug
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no&bug=289601
> >
> > which was closed without comment.
>
> It was /not/ closed without comment. Admittedly the comment is only in the
> subject header of the mail to -done, but it provides the answer to all of
> your other questions.
Ok, I see it now. But its not very convenient right now to look at the
headers in bug reports, so I usually skip them (sometimes I look at
the date).
Otherwise: Yes, I see the error
<snip>
> http://packages.debian.org/lusernet.app works fine, as does making the
> appropriate change in the PTS search and URL.
Unfortunately you also skipped b) of my mail. IMHO
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lusernet.html
should not simply be blank, at least return a 404.
> The PTS should probably be fixed to cope better with no longer existing /
> renamed / merged source packages, but I'm not entirely sure what the best
> way to do that would be.
Yep, so feel free to retitle and use severity wishlist.
Thanks for replying so quickly.
Greetings
Helge
--
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. Helge.Kreutzmann@itp.uni-hannover.de
gpg signed mail preferred
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/
Attachment:
pgpo2QmSCyfys.pgp
Description: PGP signature