Bug#309768: marked as done (packages.debian.org: changelog: standards-version parsed as telnet: link)
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2005 00:09:16 +0200
with message-id <20050703220916.GA8422@djpig.de>
and subject line New changelog->html conversion code
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 12:28:48 +0000
>From kink@squirrelmail.org Thu May 19 05:28:48 2005
Return-path: <kink@squirrelmail.org>
Received: from warp.os9.nl [145.99.250.222]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYk8t-0000GQ-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 05:28:48 -0700
Received: by warp.os9.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 2E86AE6AAB; Thu, 19 May 2005 14:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thijs Kinkhorst <kink@squirrelmail.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: packages.debian.org: changelog: standards-version parsed as telnet: link
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:26:29 +0200
Message-Id: <20050519122629.2E86AE6AAB@warp.os9.nl>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
The changelogs accessible from packages.debian.org are parsed and
translated into HTML. If a changelog item contains a standards
version update, like this:
* standards version 3.6.1.0
(from
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/x/xlockmore/xlockmore_5.13-2/changelog
)
this number is then translated into a link to telnet://3.6.1.0 which is
obviously incorrect. I think the parser guesses that this is an
IP-address. Since standards versions appear commonly in these
changelogs, I wouldn't parse them this way.
Even more, I don't find it logical at all to link a random IP-address to the
telnet protocol... there's as much sense in that as in linking it with
FTP, HTTP, irc or any other protocol. Therefore I propose to drop the
IP-address-to-telnet-links-parsing entirely.
Regards,
Thijs Kinkhorst
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309768-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 22:09:22 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Sun Jul 03 15:09:22 2005
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DpCeQ-0002tS-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:09:22 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DpCeK-0007Ib-K3; Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:09:16 +0200
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 00:09:16 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 309768-done@bugs.debian.org, 313420-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: New changelog->html conversion code
Message-ID: <20050703220916.GA8422@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 309768-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Some completly new code is now used on packages.debian.org for the
conversion of changelogs to HTML and should fix most issues that
did exist with the old code used before.
(Mostly by not trying some things where the old code failed horribly)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: