Bug#307570: marked as done (please provide releasenotes (Re: Release update: editorial changes to the testing propagation scripts))
Your message dated Wed, 4 May 2005 12:54:05 +0200
with message-id <200505041254.09301.debian@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Bug#307570: please provide releasenotes (Re: Release update: editorial changes to the testing propagation scripts)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2005 23:24:44 +0000
>From debian@layer-acht.org Tue May 03 16:24:44 2005
Return-path: <debian@layer-acht.org>
Received: from bone.digitalis.org [212.12.48.27]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DT6ku-0000x3-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 16:24:44 -0700
Received: from localhost (bone [127.0.0.1])
by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FC7329946;
Wed, 4 May 2005 01:24:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bone.digitalis.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bone [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 28116-08; Wed, 4 May 2005 01:24:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from matrix.athome (d010017.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.10.17])
(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE19C329944;
Wed, 4 May 2005 01:24:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: please provide releasenotes (Re: Release update: editorial changes to the testing propagation scripts)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 01:23:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <20050503194628.GA6007@mauritius.dodds.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050503194628.GA6007@mauritius.dodds.net>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, submit@bugs.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[🔎] 200505040124.05843.debian@layer-acht.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at digitalis.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: www.debian.org
Hi,
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 21:46, Steve Langasek posted a fine mail about a fin=
e=20
change (thanks for both to whom it may apply).
Whohoo! :-)
Regarding testing upgrades from woody, I would like to propose mentioning=20
more visible that the suggested upgrade tool is aptitude, not apt-get - few=
er=20
people than you might think read the fine releasenotes :-)=20
This might be related to the fact the they're somewhat hidden, at least=20
to ./google "sarge releasenotes" -=20
http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes isn't helpful atm eithe=
r.
regards & keep on rockin' ;-)
Holger
> As before, being able to hold to this schedule depends heavily on a
> steadily dropping RC bug count, so if that isn't happening, the timeline
> will have to be tweaked accordingly.
> Note once again that you can stage NEW uploads in experimental to avoid
> disruption in unstable.
--nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCeAgVUHLQNqxYNSARArWEAKCxHgLg5HqWtDzORypyTXbTuBQIrwCcDRaj
wAk27jjbm2/TXU7R4b4IkL8=
=8UZo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1377472.aBZrzoapJE--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307570-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 10:54:43 +0000
>From debian@layer-acht.org Wed May 04 03:54:43 2005
Return-path: <debian@layer-acht.org>
Received: from bone.digitalis.org [212.12.48.27]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTHWd-0000eS-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 03:54:43 -0700
Received: from localhost (bone [127.0.0.1])
by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA40329946
for <307570-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 4 May 2005 12:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bone.digitalis.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bone [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 31516-06 for <307570-done@bugs.debian.org>;
Wed, 4 May 2005 12:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from matrix.athome (d010017.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.10.17])
(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by bone.digitalis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F06329944
for <307570-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 4 May 2005 12:54:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Holger Levsen <debian@layer-acht.org>
To: 307570-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#307570: please provide releasenotes (Re: Release update: editorial changes to the testing propagation scripts)
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 12:54:05 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <20050503194628.GA6007@mauritius.dodds.net> <[🔎] 200505040124.05843.debian@layer-acht.org>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 200505040124.05843.debian@layer-acht.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1662099.YKPOCe5LQl";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200505041254.09301.debian@layer-acht.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at digitalis.org
Delivered-To: 307570-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart1662099.YKPOCe5LQl
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
done
thanks!
--nextPart1662099.YKPOCe5LQl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCeKnRUHLQNqxYNSARAv5gAKCh61F34gRG4RneZ84Vv3dUSZ8AawCeJM+U
jflLzuF2id5mzPFdhtiy2eA=
=czwX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1662099.YKPOCe5LQl--
Reply to: