Re: xhtml, was: Examples Debian WWW with css
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 01:23:26PM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 21.11.04 um 05:00 Uhr schrieb Mike Hommey:
> >It is wrong. xhtml 1.0 pages SHOULD be served as application/xhtml+xml
> >but can be served as text/html for compatibility purpose.
> Can you point me to the source, where it says that they may be served
> without application/xhtml+xml without any problems?
Note that XHTML 1.0 (HTML compatible) stands for XHTML following the
HTML compatibility guidelines from
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#guidelines , which is anyways a good thing
to follow not to hurt old browsers.