also sprach Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org> [2004.06.25.2136 +0200]: > The thing is, none direction wants to be played in that webpage, > because there is essential no reason to do so. And there _are_ > links to both the OSI definition of open source and to the FSF > definition to free software in that very paragraph you were > quoting. I thought there weren't and that would make your report > at least partly sensible, but now that I notice that the links are > there I am not really sure what your problem is.... I would be happy with a statement appended, like "(please check the linked pages for definitions of the terms)". Just capitalising the terms doesn't register with every user. Free Software and Open Source Software are different from free software and open source software. That's my beef. > So, the only thing left in your report that needs to be addressed > is the "As will become clear in the discussion below" and what it > is/was refering to. Like said, I'll try to track that down. Thanks. > From a quick look now (because you seem to be impatient, How so? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature