[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#228538: marked as done (Broken link on http://www.debian.org/international/)



Your message dated Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:07:17 +0200
with message-id <20040615230717.GH791@djpig.de>
and subject line Links work again
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2004 16:09:44 +0000
>From georg@fli4l.de Mon Jan 19 08:09:44 2004
Return-path: <georg@fli4l.de>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.185] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AibyC-0001vK-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:09:44 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
	by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1AibyB-0000Ta-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:09:43 +0100
Received: from [80.138.219.72] (helo=tristor)
	by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1AibyA-00033Y-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:09:42 +0100
Received: from georg by tristor with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Aiby4-00011S-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:09:36 +0100
From: Georg Neis <georg@fli4l.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Broken link on http://www.debian.org/international/
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:09:36 +0100
Message-Id: <E1Aiby4-00011S-00@tristor>
Sender: Georg Neis <georg@fli4l.de>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:fa2e35d6a2555368d702d2e8e9ad271a
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-19
Severity: minor

Hallo,

the link on <http://www.debian.org/international/> to the "the
Debian description translation project FAQ" gives a 404:
<http://ddtp.debian.org/ddtp-text/misc/ddts-faq.txt>

Gruß, Georg


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 228538-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 23:07:53 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Tue Jun 15 16:07:53 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BaN21-00037X-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:07:53 -0700
Received: from pd9530423.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.4.35] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34 1)
	id 1BaN20-00074X-9G
	for <228538-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:07:52 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BaN1R-0003qy-00
	for <228538-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:07:17 +0200
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:07:17 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 228538-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Links work again
Message-ID: <20040615230717.GH791@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 228538-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

The website of the DDTP is partly up again and all links should work
again.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: