Bug#251205: marked as done (doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives than to the list address)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:18:55 +0200
with message-id <2004-06-11_14.16.20@alfie.ist.org>
and subject line Bug#251205: doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives than to the list address
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 12:17:14 +0000
>From luk.claes@ugent.be Thu May 27 05:17:14 2004
Return-path: <luk.claes@ugent.be>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTJow-0007jG-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 05:17:14 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B88F62B42FA
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:17:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ugent.be (D5E0101A.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.16.26])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F3F2B42EC
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:17:12 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <40B5DAFF.4020406@ugent.be>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 14:11:43 +0200
From: Luk Claes <luk.claes@ugent.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives than to the list
address
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
<p>
This manual is quite outdated and there is an effort to fix it in
<email debian-doc@lists.debian.org>.
It would be better to have a link to the discussion ([1]?) than an
<email ...> tag.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2002/10/msg00103.html
Cheers
Luk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAtdr/5UTeB5t8Mo0RAqs3AJ9NonzHMvHTxvTLKe7SAyObUwfHzQCdHRpw
Jf7OIpJdtxaxKqquHND4jFs=
=HeXB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251205-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 12:19:08 +0000
>From alfie@ist.org Fri Jun 11 05:19:08 2004
Return-path: <alfie@ist.org>
Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BYl00-0002KL-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:19:08 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] helo=tausendmorgenwald)
by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BYkvB-0005KK-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:14:09 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BYkzn-0001nC-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:18:55 +0200
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:18:55 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org>
To: Luk Claes <luk.claes@ugent.be>, 251205-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#251205: doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives than to the list address
Message-ID: <2004-06-11_14.16.20@alfie.ist.org>
References: <40B5DAFF.4020406@ugent.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PGNNI9BzQDUtgA2J"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40B5DAFF.4020406@ugent.be>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s !:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,\IfUUY*hqPGSo%8WnAh7_6P@Clt8^Vy` {3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org>
Delivered-To: 251205-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HTML_10_20 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--PGNNI9BzQDUtgA2J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Luk Claes <luk.claes@ugent.be> [2004-05-27 14:11]:
> <p>
> This manual is quite outdated and there is an effort to fix it in
> <email debian-doc@lists.debian.org>.
>=20
> It would be better to have a link to the discussion ([1]?) than an
> <email ...> tag.
I've changed it to this now:
#v+
diff -r1.11 docpolicy.wml
4,5c4,6
< This manual is quite outdated and there is an effort to fix it in
< <email debian-doc@lists.debian.org>. See the current draft of the
---
> This manual is quite outdated and there is an effort to fix it on the
> <a href=3D"http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/";>debian-doc mailing list</=
a>.
> See the current draft of the
#v-
I guess this will solve the issue.
Alfie
--=20
-!- Gromitt_ is now known as Gromitt
<Getty> oh scheisse, gromitt wird wach
<Getty> da hab ich jetzt soviele lines gemacht in den letzten 24 std.
<Getty> und jetzt kommt der wieder ;) -- #debian.de
--PGNNI9BzQDUtgA2J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAyaMvMU96lewVKUIRAuSYAJ9sxEngdUos2Qpe/Cq1xrywTVgUYgCfXMrH
afZRqmMzH81zB0Uoylokv58=
=eW1b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PGNNI9BzQDUtgA2J--
Reply to: