[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#190837: marked as done (favicon.ico has wrong Content-Type)



Your message dated Thu, 27 May 2004 16:45:14 -0300
with message-id <20040527194514.GD731@ftbfs.org>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2003 09:48:40 +0000
>From wichert@wiggy.net Sat Apr 26 04:48:39 2003
Return-path: <wichert@wiggy.net>
Received: from home.wiggy.net (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140] ([yugBFWnIJ2CPVhIsytffOX8odxebQ1xP])
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 199MIR-0006BH-00; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 04:48:39 -0500
Received: from tornado.wiggy.net ([3ffe:8280:10:1d0:290:27ff:fe2d:968c] helo=tornado.home.wiggy.net)
	by mx1.wiggy.net with esmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 199MIP-0005lr-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:48:37 +0200
Received: from wichert by tornado.home.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 199MIP-0001I4-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:48:37 +0200
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:48:36 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: favicon.ico has wrong Content-Type
Message-ID: <20030426094836.GA4947@wiggy.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=ham version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-26
Severity: normal

favicon.ico is currently sent with Content-Type text/plain. This makes
mozilla segfault if you try to load the icon directly. Please
reconfigure the apaches to use Content-Type image/x-icon instead.

Wichert.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tornado 2.5.68 #1 Tue Apr 22 02:36:22 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8


-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>           http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 190837-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 19:43:35 +0000
>From kraai@ftbfs.org Thu May 27 12:43:35 2004
Return-path: <kraai@ftbfs.org>
Received: from (localhost) [200.96.125.141] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BTQmt-0006Lf-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 12:43:35 -0700
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BTQoU-0000Ea-J3
	for 190837-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 16:45:14 -0300
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:45:14 -0300
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
To: 190837-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <20040527194514.GD731@ftbfs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: 190837-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Howdy,

I've updated the apache.conf for www.debian.org to serve
favicon.ico as image/x-icon, added the appropriate directive to
the mirror instructions, and asked the mirror maintainers to
update their apache.confs.

-- 
Matt Kraai            kraai@ftbfs.org            http://ftbfs.org/



Reply to: