[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#242763: marked as done (www.debian.org: Several WNPP/RFA links are not (no longer?) valid)



Your message dated Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:54:44 +0200
with message-id <20040408165444.GB30779@djpig.de>
and subject line Bug#242763: www.debian.org: Several WNPP/RFA links are not (no longer?) valid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 16:13:39 +0000
>From kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de Thu Apr 08 09:13:39 2004
Return-path: <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BBc9q-0004gG-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:13:39 -0700
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242])
	by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i38GDXv9020107
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:13:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.99])
	by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 97DD6C0F2; Thu,  8 Apr 2004 18:13:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
	id 4FF3B5F22; Thu,  8 Apr 2004 18:13:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Helge Kreutzmann <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: Several WNPP/RFA links are not (no longer?) valid
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:13:28 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20040408161328.4FF3B5F22@pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-04-08
Severity: normal

On "http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/work_needing";
several packets are listed, where the links are not valid, i.e.
firebird yields:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=firebird

"Can't find that package."

Other examples:
libffm and libflash

Either packages.debian.org needs to be fixed to display those, or the
links/entries have to be removed.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pleione 2.4.22-grsec #1 Thu Jan 8 12:44:10 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242763-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 16:55:11 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Thu Apr 08 09:55:11 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BBco3-0003mW-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:55:11 -0700
Received: from p50839c53.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.156.83] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1BBcnw-0008S5-00
	for <242763-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:55:10 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BBcnf-00084z-00
	for <242763-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:54:47 +0200
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:54:44 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 242763-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#242763: www.debian.org: Several WNPP/RFA links are not (no longer?) valid
Message-ID: <20040408165444.GB30779@djpig.de>
References: <[🔎] 20040408161328.4FF3B5F22@pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040408161328.4FF3B5F22@pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 242763-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:13:28PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> On "http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/work_needing";
> several packets are listed, where the links are not valid, i.e.
> firebird yields:
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=firebird
> 
> "Can't find that package."
> 
> Other examples:
> libffm and libflash
> 
> Either packages.debian.org needs to be fixed to display those, or the
> links/entries have to be removed.

No, the corresponding wnpp bugs need to be closed. If you encounter such
problems feel free to close the corresponding bugs (after you checked
the packages are indeed removed) or just wait until someone from -qa
cleans up the bug list.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: