* Jens Seidel <tux-master@web.de> [2004-03-26 01:49]: > I also rephrased a sentence in events/requirements.wml which is currently > completly senseless. Is it? I don't think so. > --- events/requirements.wml 25 Jul 2002 19:05:30 -0000 1.4 > +++ events/requirements.wml 26 Mar 2004 00:23:24 -0000 > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ > > <p>In short, such a booth would be look very poor. It is quite > questionable whether this would demonstrate the high level of an > -exhibition, poor project or display that the organizers don't have > +exhibition, it displays that the organizers don't have > money or don't want to spend money on free software projects. It is a simple enumeration and makes sense to me. The German translation was bogus, right. Sorry about the silly translation on my part, but that doesn't mean that the English version is broken. :) I would add an "it would" infront of display, though. And I am wondering if "high level" is the right paraphrasing along with the other rather negative parts in that enumeration. So long, Alfie -- If I lived in a country that still adhered to non-standard and non-metric units of measurement and that promoted MM-DD-YYYY as an acceptable date format, I wouldn't throw stones. ;) -- Charl P. Botha to an .us citicen complaining that 22.3. is not unambiguous
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature