Re: Wrong indexes to debian-security-announce-99 mailing list messages in DWN
Jens Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that all URLs to the debian-security-announce-99 mailing list
> are wrong in News/weekly/1999/32/index and others. The following patch fixes
> this:
Since I cannot verify all this, please fix the wrong and broken URLs.
It's very good that you check them and spend time on it to improve our
website.
> Does anyone know where the 19 additional messages come from? Is it possible to
> change the mailing list archive or is this just an error in several DWN?
Maybe it was an archive reorganisation? Looks like spam and other crap
is now visible in the web archive.
> Index: english/News/weekly/1999/32/index.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/News/weekly/1999/32/index.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -u -u -r1.12 index.wml
> --- english/News/weekly/1999/32/index.wml 15 Feb 2004 12:04:38 -0000 1.12
> +++ english/News/weekly/1999/32/index.wml 11 Mar 2004 15:13:58 -0000
> @@ -20,21 +20,21 @@
> is that <b>the security team is preparing up to release Debian 2.1r3</b>, which
> will have all the security updates from the past several months in it. A fix
> was released for a serious root exploit in
> -<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00000.html";>
> +<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00019.html";>
> cfingerd</a>, plus fixes for
> -<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00004.html";>
> +<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00023.html";>
> smtp-refuser</a>,
> -<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00007.html";>
> +<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00026.html";>
> trn</a>, and
> -<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00006.html";>
> +<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00025.html";>
> man2html</a> that prevent overwriting and deletion of arbitrary files.
> For termcap-compat, there is a
> -<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00003.html";>
> +<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00022.html";>
> buffer overflow fix</a>, although Debian only provides termcap as an option
> and no Debian packages are vulnerable. Announcements were also made about an
> -<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00002.html";>
> +<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00021.html";>
> old hole in rsync</a>, and an
> - <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00005.html";>
> + <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-99/msg00024.html";>
> unlikely problem</a> with seyon.
> </p>
Regards,
Joey
--
There are lies, statistics and benchmarks.
Reply to: