Bug#234686: marked as done (Security announcements should contain link to http://packages.debian.org/<package>)
Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:36:46 +0100
with message-id <20040305193646.GF29933@djpig.de>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2004 06:58:59 +0000
>From puhuri@netlab.hut.fi Tue Feb 24 22:58:59 2004
Return-path: <puhuri@netlab.hut.fi>
Received: from keskus.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.176]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Avt0U-0006rS-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:58:59 -0800
Received: from ws26.netlab.hut.fi (ws26.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.153])
by keskus.netlab.hut.fi (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1P6wuGZ008599
for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:58:56 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from puhuri@localhost)
by ws26.netlab.hut.fi (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.6) id i1P6wuY10274;
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:58:56 +0200 (EET)
From: Markus Peuhkuri <puhuri@netlab.hut.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16444.18351.939067.804264@ws26.netlab.hut.fi>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:58:55 +0200
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Security announcements should contain link to http://packages.debian.org/<package>
X-Mailer: VM 7.08 under Emacs 21.1.1
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2004-02-25
Severity: wishlist
A small convience feature would be adding link from security
announcement to package page of package in question, not only for
download links, i.e. http://packages.debian.org/<package>. I find
myself quite often visiting package page after reading DSA, and from
there jumping to other pages (bugs) for that package.
--
Markus Peuhkuri ! http://www.iki.fi/puhuri/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 234686-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2004 19:37:05 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Fri Mar 05 11:37:05 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AzL84-0005so-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 11:37:05 -0800
Received: from pd9e399e8.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.153.232] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AzL83-0007yo-00
for <234686-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:37:04 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AzL7n-000417-00
for <234686-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 20:36:47 +0100
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:36:46 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 234686-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <20040305193646.GF29933@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 234686-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_05
X-Spam-Level:
Hi.
The DSAs now include a link to packages.debian.org.
Thanks for suggesting it.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: