Bug#178831: marked as done (packages.debian.org could use real substring searches)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id <20040112153533.GB2601@djpig.de>
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2003 22:11:53 +0000
>From ralphs@netwinder.org Tue Jan 28 16:11:51 2003
Return-path: <ralphs@netwinder.org>
Received: from kei.netwinder.org (netwinder.org) [209.202.115.26] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ddxP-0003i8-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:11:51 -0600
Received: from ralphs by netwinder.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1)
id 18ddxO-0004FJ-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:11:50 -0500
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:11:50 -0500
From: Ralph Siemsen <ralphs@netwinder.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: packages.debian.org could use real substring searches
Message-ID: <20030128171150.B11701@kei.netwinder.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: current as of 2003/01/28
It would be nice if the substring seach option on the "Seach package
directories" actually did substring searches. That would mean if I
seach for "base64" then "libmime-base64-perl" should be returned.
I realize the comments right on the page indicate that this doesn't
happen, so its not a bug.. so could this go on the wishlist?
--
Ralph Siemsen
www.netwinder.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 103694-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 21:22:58 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Tue Jan 13 15:22:58 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-000059-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: 224143-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 103694-done@bugs.debian.org, 172055-done@bugs.debian.org,
195614-done@bugs.debian.org, 131631-done@bugs.debian.org,
215999-done@bugs.debian.org, 109338-done@bugs.debian.org,
202157-done@bugs.debian.org, 155346-done@bugs.debian.org,
204099-done@bugs.debian.org, 177669-done@bugs.debian.org,
125976-done@bugs.debian.org, 162588-done@bugs.debian.org,
219653-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: <20040112153533.GB2601@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 103694-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level:
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Last week the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs:
Closes: #224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored=20
* New search_packages script
Closes: #35765: packages.debian.org: text (HTML) that's on each page shou=
ld be excluded from description search=20
Closes: #103694: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't search on s=
ubwords in package names
Closes: #115004, #156794, #175644, #178831 merged bugs
Closes: #172055: packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g=
. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
Closes: #176837 merged bug
Closes: #195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package=
"check"=20
* Contain information about non-i386 packages
Closes: #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
Closes: #23350 merged bug
Closes: #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated
* Include DDTP translations
* Better parsing/using of input data
Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
* Handle virtual packages
Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies
* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages
Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big
* Minor fixes:
Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone
Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug Closes:
#221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview
I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not
restored" open until search_packages is back, too.
Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his
feedback while writing the scripts.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAAr7FQbn06FtxPfARApq7AKDHf46WpZCSgaxWUsP8JQ294ZSwEgCgtdvu
UiYOrOUz35FAOsxby6X+pS4=
=D8Eb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
Reply to: