Bug#202157: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders)
Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[🔎] 54980.217.234.62.246.1073746600.squirrel@webmail.sorgfalt.net>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2003 10:00:46 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sun Jul 20 05:00:44 2003
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19eAzj-0006Nl-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 05:00:43 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 22C4E26B2E; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:00:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1640022988; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:00:38 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: packages.d.o should list uploaders
Message-ID: <20030720100038.GA9768@regression.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The packages.d.o pages list the maintainer of the package. However,
it would be nice to additionally show the uploaders. Having uploaders
displays more prominently might encourage people to become
co-maintainers of packages.
As an example, alsa-base's source package alsa-driver has:
Package: alsa-driver
Binary: alsa-base, alsaconf, alsa-source, alsa-headers
Maintainer: Debian-Alsa Psychos <debian-alsa@lists.wedontsleep.org>
Uploaders: Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org>, Steve Kowalik <stevenk@debian.org>, David B. Harris <david@eelf.ddts.net>
alsa-base's packages page says:
| Debian-Alsa Psychos is responsible for this Debian package.
I would be nice if this page would say:
| Debian-Alsa Psychos and Jordi Mallach, Steve Kowalik and David B.
| Harris are esponsible for this Debian package.
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202157-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:30 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Mon Jan 12 13:05:29 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[🔎] 54980.217.234.62.246.1073746600.squirrel@webmail.sorgfalt.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <frank@lichtenheld.de>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References:
In-Reply-To:
Delivered-To: 202157-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):
* Contain information about non-i386 packages
Closes: #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
Closes: #23350 merged bug
Closes: #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated
* Include DDTP translations
* Better parsing/using of input data
Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
* Handle virtual packages
Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies
* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages
Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big
* Minor fixes:
Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone
Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug Closes:
#221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview
I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not
restored" open until search_packages is back, too.
Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his
feedback while writing the scripts.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
Reply to: