[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#177669: marked as done (packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big)



Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[🔎] 54980.217.234.62.246.1073746600.squirrel@webmail.sorgfalt.net>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2003 05:40:50 +0000
>From jidanni@dman.ddts.net Mon Jan 20 23:40:50 2003
Return-path: <jidanni@dman.ddts.net>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18ar9W-00071m-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:40:50 -0600
Received: from tc210-203-44-151.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.44.151] helo=jidanni.org)
	by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
	id 18ar9S-0008V0-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:40:49 -0500
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18anKk-00025s-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:36:10 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Dan Jacobson" <jidanni@dman.ddts.net>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html
	too big
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.2
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:36:10 +0800
Message-Id: <E18anKk-00025s-00@jidanni.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0
	tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: **

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-21
Severity: wishlist

http://packages.debian.org/*/allpackages.html is over 1 meg.
please put warnings on their parent pages.

BTW, tidy(1) shows tons of: Warning: <font> attribute "color" has invalid value "FF0000"


also there, please make a link:
list of packages added, updated within the last week, month.


BTW, what is <BODY> doing deep in http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html
<dt><a href="web/libroxen-sexybody.html">libroxen-sexybody</a> 0.2-7
        <dd><BODY> tag replacement module for the Roxen Challenger web server
<dt><a href="web/libroxen-simplenews.html">libroxen-simplenews</a> 2.7-7



some mostly offline folks might just want a quick diet checklist of
current package numbers,

3dwm-clock 0.3.1-11
3dwm-csgclient 0.3.1-11
3dwm-geoclient 0.3.1-11
3dwm-pickclient 0.3.1-11
3dwm-server 0.3.1-11
3dwm-texclient 0.3.1-11

one could use this makefile
B=http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html
t=/tmp/f
$t:
	lynx -dump -nolist $B|sed -n '/^   [^ ]/s/...//p'|sed '1{/About/d;};/^$$/,$$d' > $@
asv: $t #see what is newer than last time I got Packages.gz
	apt-show-versions -u |sed 's#/.* # #'|sort|join - $t|awk '$$2!=$$3'

or better yet, you could put a $t.gz on the site... less than 100K
instead of the 1000 K download... may be better ways.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177669-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:26 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Mon Jan 12 13:04:53 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
        by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
        Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[🔎] 54980.217.234.62.246.1073746600.squirrel@webmail.sorgfalt.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <frank@lichtenheld.de>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: 177669-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages

 Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big

* Minor fixes:

 Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
 Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone

 Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug  Closes:
#221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview

I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not
restored" open until search_packages is back, too.

Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his
feedback while writing the scripts.

Gruesse,
  Frank Lichtenheld





Reply to: