[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#225121: marked as done (language bugs in http://www.debian.org/users/)



Your message dated Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:05:08 -0800
with message-id <20031228040508.GA506@catalunya>
and subject line Bug#225121: language bugs in http://www.debian.org/users/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2003 13:38:25 +0000
>From joostvb-debian-bugs-20031226@mdcc.cx Fri Dec 26 07:37:44 2003
Return-path: <joostvb-debian-bugs-20031226@mdcc.cx>
Received: from gelfand.mdcc.cx (schilow.mdcc.cx) [80.126.189.155] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AZqbe-0006bT-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 05:58:14 -0600
Received: from nagy.mdcc.cx (nagy.mdcc.cx [192.168.26.30])
	by schilow.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB3A16D6
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:58:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nagy.mdcc.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 96F2F1313E; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:58:10 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:58:10 +0100
From: Joost van Baal <joostvb-debian-bugs-20031226@mdcc.cx>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: language bugs in http://www.debian.org/users/
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20031226115810.GA31715@nagy.mdcc.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 8FC6 A40E 31B8 7E0E 2270  D7A9 0606 9CF2 9694 57F0
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x969457F0
X-PGP-Key: http://mdcc.cx/~joostvb/joostvb_key.asc
X-Accept-Language: nl, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=4.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 


--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Hi,

I've found an English language bug in http://www.debian.org/users/ .
Patch is here:

-------------------

--- index.wml.orig      2003-12-26 12:50:06.000000000 +0100
+++ index.wml   2003-12-26 12:50:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
     personnel.
   </p>
   <p>
-    Debian was choosen for its ease of administration and installation
+    Debian was chosen for its ease of administration and installation
     through the use of .debs and FAI, allowing installation of labs of
     12 computers within 20 minutes without the need for a CD or a
     floppy and without any user interaction. The creation of packages
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@
     DHCP, Usenet News and version control.
   </p>
   <p>
-    We've choosen Debian for its reliable security update availability, st=
rong=20
+    We've chosen Debian for its reliable security update availability, str=
ong=20
     presence on the GNU/Linux server market, because of available knowledg=
e and
=20
     experience in the UvT sysadmin group, flexibility of the OS, no licens=
e=20
     costs (not even for security updates), and possibility to run a locall=
y=20
@@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@
 <userdetail "ComputacionIntegral" "Computaci=EF=BF=BDn Integral, Chile" "h=
ttp://www.cintegral.cl/">
   <p>
     Actually we have 2 servers using Debian, one for mail relaying using
-    exim, and another for apache, bind, qmail. We have choosen Debian
+    exim, and another for apache, bind, qmail. We have chosen Debian
     because of stability, functionality, flexibility and wonderful
     adaptability.
   </p>
@@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@
 <userdetail "Portuaria" "Portuaria Andes S.A., Chile"
"http://www.pasasa.cl/";>
   <p>
     We have a network of 4 Debian servers; our servers run databases,
-    apache, mail, and firewalling.  We have choosen Debian because of
+    apache, mail, and firewalling.  We have chosen Debian because of
     stability, functionality, flexibility and adaptability. We are a
     Chilean company, of San Antonio port.
   </p>
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@
   </p>
   <p>
     We will have a big Debian network base, our servers actually run
-    Debian too (over 200) . We have choosen Debian because of
+    Debian too (over 200) . We have chosen Debian because of
     stability, functionality, level of development, flexibility and
     adaptability.
   </p>

----------

(Thanks a lot for the recent update of the page, I am really proud
Tilburg University is listed now :)

Bye,

Joost

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nagy 2.6.0-test11 #1 Wed Dec 3 12:33:13 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8


--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/7CJSBgac8paUV/ARAgsyAJ4iZp00mxIkrHS8GZlkVJsYMBeZBgCfdMjx
RxSQ9ejqIO8qQFWgi4uHrro=
=yJVy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--huq684BweRXVnRxX--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225121-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Dec 2003 04:26:13 +0000
>From kraai@lafn.org Sat Dec 27 22:26:12 2003
Return-path: <kraai@lafn.org>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AaS5H-00069W-00; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:59:19 -0600
Received: from catalunya (host-66-81-202-89.rev.o1.com [66.81.202.89])
	by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id hBS3xC9W009327;
	Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:59:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kraai@lafn.org)
Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AaSAv-0000E8-00; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:05:09 -0800
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:05:08 -0800
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
To: Joost van Baal <joostvb-debian-bugs-20031226@mdcc.cx>,
   225121-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#225121: language bugs in http://www.debian.org/users/
Message-ID: <20031228040508.GA506@catalunya>
References: <[🔎] 20031226115810.GA31715@nagy.mdcc.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20031226115810.GA31715@nagy.mdcc.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Kraai <kraai@lafn.org>
Delivered-To: 225121-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOOASDF,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 12:58:10PM +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
> I've found an English language bug in http://www.debian.org/users/ .
> Patch is here:
> 
> -------------------
> 
> --- index.wml.orig      2003-12-26 12:50:06.000000000 +0100
> +++ index.wml   2003-12-26 12:50:46.000000000 +0100
> @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
>      personnel.
>    </p>
>    <p>
> -    Debian was choosen for its ease of administration and installation
> +    Debian was chosen for its ease of administration and installation
>      through the use of .debs and FAI, allowing installation of labs of
>      12 computers within 20 minutes without the need for a CD or a
>      floppy and without any user interaction. The creation of packages
> @@ -848,7 +848,7 @@
>      DHCP, Usenet News and version control.
>    </p>
>    <p>
> -    We've choosen Debian for its reliable security update availability, strong 
> +    We've chosen Debian for its reliable security update availability, strong 
>      presence on the GNU/Linux server market, because of available knowledge and
>  
>      experience in the UvT sysadmin group, flexibility of the OS, no license 
>      costs (not even for security updates), and possibility to run a locally 
> @@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@
>  <userdetail "ComputacionIntegral" "Computaci???n Integral, Chile" "http://www.cintegral.cl/";>
>    <p>
>      Actually we have 2 servers using Debian, one for mail relaying using
> -    exim, and another for apache, bind, qmail. We have choosen Debian
> +    exim, and another for apache, bind, qmail. We have chosen Debian
>      because of stability, functionality, flexibility and wonderful
>      adaptability.
>    </p>
> @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@
>  <userdetail "Portuaria" "Portuaria Andes S.A., Chile"
> "http://www.pasasa.cl/";>
>    <p>
>      We have a network of 4 Debian servers; our servers run databases,
> -    apache, mail, and firewalling.  We have choosen Debian because of
> +    apache, mail, and firewalling.  We have chosen Debian because of
>      stability, functionality, flexibility and adaptability. We are a
>      Chilean company, of San Antonio port.
>    </p>
> @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@
>    </p>
>    <p>
>      We will have a big Debian network base, our servers actually run
> -    Debian too (over 200) . We have choosen Debian because of
> +    Debian too (over 200) . We have chosen Debian because of
>      stability, functionality, level of development, flexibility and
>      adaptability.
>    </p>
> 
> ----------
> 
> (Thanks a lot for the recent update of the page, I am really proud
> Tilburg University is listed now :)

I've fixed this.  Thanks for reporting it.

-- 
Matt Kraai                                         kraai@ftbfs.org



Reply to: