Bug#214783: marked as done (Typos on http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:28:58 -0700
with message-id <20031009042858.GA263@ftbfs.org>
and subject line Bug#214783: Typos on http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 17:10:28 +0000
>From martin@divbyzero.net Wed Oct 08 12:09:07 2003
Return-path: <martin@divbyzero.net>
Received: from mail.bauer-kirch.de [80.237.234.121]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7HoB-00015R-00; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:09:07 -0500
Received: (qmail 16173 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 17:10:27 -0000
Received: from somewhere (IP somewhere)
by mail.bauer-kirch.de with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 17:10:27 -0000
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:09:08 +0200
From: Martin Jansen <martin@divbyzero.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Typos on http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20031008170908.GA21460@martinjansen.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning contains some small typos. A
unified diff that fixes those is included below.
Index: keysigning.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/events/keysigning.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -r1.8 keysigning.wml
--- keysigning.wml 29 Sep 2003 19:05:07 -0000 1.8
+++ keysigning.wml 8 Oct 2003 17:03:09 -0000
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
<ol>
<li>The key owner convinces the signer that the identity in the UID is
- indeed their own identity by whatever evidence the signer is
+ indeed his/her own identity by whatever evidence the signer is
willing to accept as convincing. Usually this means the key owner
must present a government issued ID with a picture and information
that match up with the key owner. (Some signers know that
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
additional and/or alternative evidence of identity).
<li>The key owner verifies that the fingerprint of the key about to be
- signed is indeed their own.
+ signed is indeed his/her own.
</ol>
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --recv-keys 0xDEADBEEF
</pre>
- <p>Note we can use the last eight hex digits of the key in this and
+ <p>Note that we can use the last eight hex digits of the key in this and
other GnuPG operations. The <tt>0x</tt> in front is also
optional.</p>
</li>
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
</li>
-<li> Once you make sure everything went fine, you can send the signed key to
+<li> Once you have made sure everything went fine, you can send the signed key to
its recipient by doing:
<pre>
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
</pre>
<p>The <code>-a</code> option exports the key in ASCII format so
it can
- be emailed without possibility of corruption.</p>
+ be emailed without the possibility of corruption.</p>
</li>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214783-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Oct 2003 06:44:49 +0000
>From kraai@lafn.org Thu Oct 09 01:44:48 2003
Return-path: <kraai@lafn.org>
Received: from host-66-81-192-194.rev.o1.com (ftbfs.org) [66.81.192.194]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A7UXX-00018i-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 01:44:48 -0500
Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A7SQ6-00008q-00; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:28:58 -0700
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:28:58 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu>
To: "James A. Treacy" <treacy@debian.org>
Cc: Gerfried Fuchs <alfie@ist.org>, 214783-done@bugs.debian.org,
Martin Jansen <martin@divbyzero.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#214783: Typos on http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
Message-ID: <20031009042858.GA263@ftbfs.org>
References: <[🔎] 20031008170908.GA21460@martinjansen.com> <[🔎] 20031008174423.GA297@ftbfs.org> <[🔎] 2003-10-08_22.39.09@alfie.ist.org> <[🔎] 20031009030500.GA1374@debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20031009030500.GA1374@debian.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Kraai <kraai@lafn.org>
Delivered-To: 214783-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,HTML_00_10,HTML_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:05:00PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:39:13PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu> [2003-10-08 10:44]:
> > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:08PM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> > >> -<li> Once you make sure everything went fine, you can send the signed key to
> > >> +<li> Once you have made sure everything went fine, you can send the signed key to
> > >> its recipient by doing:
> > >>
> > >> <pre>
> > >
> > > I don't think this is necessary.
> >
> > But I guess it would be good to at least do s/make/made/, because it
> > requires an "earlier" time than present time.
>
> This looks like one of those cases where few native English speakers
> would use textbook proper English but many non-native speakers, used to
> a more precise language, find it confusing. Can I suggest the following:
>
> <li> Once everything looks good, you can send the signed key to
OK, done.
--
Matt
Reply to: