Bug#204855: marked as done (www.debian.org: Sentence does not make much sense...)
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:28:00 +0200
with message-id <20030810202800.GB706@djpig.de>
and subject line Bug#204855: www.debian.org: Sentence does not make much sense...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 19:34:06 +0000
>From data@reypastor.hispalinux.es Sun Aug 10 14:34:03 2003
Return-path: <data@reypastor.hispalinux.es>
Received: from (reypastor.hispalinux.es) [213.229.161.44]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19lvx5-0008R5-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:34:03 -0500
Received: by reypastor.hispalinux.es (Postfix, from userid 1019)
id 9466D1A85C5; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:34:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:34:02 +0200
From: Jesus Climent <jesus.climent@hispalinux.es>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: www.debian.org: Sentence does not make much sense...
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030810193402.GA23798@reypastor.hispalinux.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-10
Severity: minor
>From the page:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer
This sentence does not make much sense:
Make sure that the To field of your message to the author to has only the
author(s) address(es) in it; put both the person who reported the bug and
nnn-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the CC field.
Mostly in the first line, the "to the author to has ..."
Thanks
data
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux reypastor 2.4.21 #1 vie jun 13 22:28:10 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro
--
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.21
It's called a change-over. The movie goes on and nobody knows the
difference.
--Narrator (Fight club)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204855-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 20:28:29 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Sun Aug 10 15:28:19 2003
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19lwnZ-0004Bq-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:28:17 -0500
Received: from pd9530542.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.5.66] helo=djpig.hell)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35)
id 19lwnY-0001MT-00
for <204855-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:28:16 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19lwnI-0002GJ-00
for <204855-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:28:00 +0200
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:28:00 +0200
To: 204855-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#204855: www.debian.org: Sentence does not make much sense...
Message-ID: <20030810202800.GB706@djpig.de>
References: <[🔎] 20030810193402.GA23798@reypastor.hispalinux.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030810193402.GA23798@reypastor.hispalinux.es>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 204855-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 09:34:02PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> This sentence does not make much sense:
>
> Make sure that the To field of your message to the author to has only the
> author(s) address(es) in it; put both the person who reported the bug and
> nnn-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the CC field.
>
> Mostly in the first line, the "to the author to has ..."
I removed the second 'to'. I belive the sentence is now correct (?)
Gruesse,
--
*** Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> ***
*** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
- http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
Reply to: