[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#202865: marked as done (http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/ not linked from /devel/testing)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:25:58 +0000
with message-id <20031109182558.GD9552@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Bug#202865: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/ not linked from /devel/testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2003 17:11:35 +0000
>From marcin@owsiany.pl Fri Jul 25 12:11:33 2003
Return-path: <marcin@owsiany.pl>
Received: from ns2.skynet.com.pl (skynet.skynet.com.pl) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19g66O-0003IX-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:11:33 -0500
Received: from localhost ([] helo=melina.dom)
	by skynet.skynet.com.pl with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19g66N-0003vo-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:11:31 +0200
Received: from porridge by melina.dom with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19g66M-000376-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:11:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
From: Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/ not linked from /devel/testing
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:11:30 +0200
Message-Id: <E19g66M-000376-00@melina.dom>
Sender: Marcin Owsiany <marcin@owsiany.pl>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-25
Severity: wishlist

It's a great resource, I think it should be linked to.

Maybe even it could replace
since it's more verbose in some situations.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux melina 2.4.20-3-k7 #1 Sun Jun 8 01:35:14 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL

Received: (at 202865-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Nov 2003 18:26:01 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Sun Nov 09 12:26:00 2003
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AIuG8-0001ma-00; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 12:26:00 -0600
Received: from [] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
	by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
	for 202865-done@bugs.debian.org
	id 1AIuG7-0001ep-00; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 18:25:59 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	for 202865-done@bugs.debian.org
	id 1AIuG6-0002eU-00; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 18:25:58 +0000
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:25:58 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 202865-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#202865: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/ not linked from /devel/testing
Message-ID: <20031109182558.GD9552@riva.ucam.org>
References: <E19g66M-000376-00@melina.dom> <[🔎] 20031109031943.GA2117@riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20031109031943.GA2117@riva.ucam.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 202865-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:19:43AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:11:30PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > It's a great resource, I think it should be linked to.
> Is there any reason not to just do that?

Committed with a spelling modification as described in the thread on


Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: