Bug#214783: Typos on http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:08PM +0200, Martin Jansen wrote:
> Index: keysigning.wml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/events/keysigning.wml,v
> retrieving revision 1.8
> diff -u -r1.8 keysigning.wml
> --- keysigning.wml 29 Sep 2003 19:05:07 -0000 1.8
> +++ keysigning.wml 8 Oct 2003 17:03:09 -0000
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> <ol>
>
> <li>The key owner convinces the signer that the identity in the UID is
> - indeed their own identity by whatever evidence the signer is
> + indeed his/her own identity by whatever evidence the signer is
> willing to accept as convincing. Usually this means the key owner
> must present a government issued ID with a picture and information
> that match up with the key owner. (Some signers know that
"their" is can be used for the third-person singular.
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> additional and/or alternative evidence of identity).
>
> <li>The key owner verifies that the fingerprint of the key about to be
> - signed is indeed their own.
> + signed is indeed his/her own.
>
> </ol>
>
Likewise.
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
> gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --recv-keys 0xDEADBEEF
> </pre>
>
> - <p>Note we can use the last eight hex digits of the key in this and
> + <p>Note that we can use the last eight hex digits of the key in this and
> other GnuPG operations. The <tt>0x</tt> in front is also
> optional.</p>
>
> </li>
OK.
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
>
> </li>
>
> -<li> Once you make sure everything went fine, you can send the signed key to
> +<li> Once you have made sure everything went fine, you can send the signed key to
> its recipient by doing:
>
> <pre>
I don't think this is necessary.
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
> </pre>
>
> <p>The <code>-a</code> option exports the key in ASCII format so
> it can
> - be emailed without possibility of corruption.</p>
> + be emailed without the possibility of corruption.</p>
>
> </li>
>
OK.
Thanks for the corrections, I'll commit the ones I like this
evening. If you disagree, please let me know why.
--
Matt
Reply to: