Bug#214289: marked as done (devel/people: missing maintainers, patch for generic handling)
Your message dated Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:10 -0700
with message-id <20031008032210.GB963@ftbfs.org>
and subject line Bug#214289: devel/people: missing maintainers, patch for generic handling
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2003 23:05:33 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Sun Oct 05 18:05:31 2003
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A6HwR-0006yv-00; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 18:05:31 -0500
Received: from pd9530bf5.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.11.245] helo=djpigpb.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1A6Hvu-0007Oa-00; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 01:04:58 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpigpb.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A6I1O-0001Cp-00; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 01:10:38 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0176918887=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: devel/people: missing maintainers, patch for generic handling
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.32
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 01:10:38 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1A6I1O-0001Cp-00@djpigpb.djpig.de>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============0176918887==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
In the Special Maintainers list of cron/people_scripts/people.pl are
again some maintainer team names missing:
Debian GNOME Maintainers
Debian LDP Maintainers
Debian KDE/Qt Maintainers
Attached is a patch that handles these names in a more generic way
(untested).
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux djpigpb.djpig.de 2.4.22-ben2 #1 So Okt 5 15:50:31 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE
--===============0176918887==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="work/debian-www/patches/maintainer.teams.patch"
Index: people.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/cron/people_scripts/people.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 people.pl
--- people.pl 16 Sep 2003 12:16:35 -0000 1.12
+++ people.pl 5 Oct 2003 23:03:08 -0000
@@ -14,11 +14,8 @@
"Debian QA Group",
"Debian Install System Team",
"Debian Policy List",
- "Debian GCC maintainers",
- "Debian GNUstep maintainers",
"GNU Hurd Maintainers",
"GNU Libc Maintainers",
- "Debian Apache Maintainers",
"Debbugs developers",
"Dpkg Development",
"teTeX maintainers",
@@ -27,9 +24,6 @@
"Dynamic DNS Tools and Services",
"Debian OpenOffice Team",
"Cdbs Hackers",
- "Debian Java Maintainers",
- "Debian OCaml Maintainers",
- "Debian SDL maintainers",
);
@@ -218,7 +212,10 @@
}
$maintainer = from_utf8_or_iso88591_to_sgml($maintainer);
# Take care of the annoying cases and exceptions and overrides and stuff
- if ($maintainer =~ /Debian Quality Assurance.*<(.+)>/) {
+ if ($maintainer =~ /(Debian \S+ [Mm]aintainers).*<(.+)>/) {
+ $lastname = $1; $firstname = ''; $email = $2;
+ }
+ elsif ($maintainer =~ /Debian Quality Assurance.*<(.+)>/) {
$lastname = 'Debian QA Group'; $firstname = ''; $email = $1;
}
elsif ($maintainer =~ /Boot Floppies Team <(.+)>/) {
--===============0176918887==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214289-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 03:22:14 +0000
>From kraai@lafn.org Tue Oct 07 22:20:29 2003
Return-path: <kraai@lafn.org>
Received: from host-66-81-16-99.rev.o1.com (ftbfs.org) [66.81.16.99]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A74sH-00009O-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:20:29 -0500
Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1A74tv-0000Jc-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:22:11 -0700
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:22:10 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu>
To: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>, 214289-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#214289: devel/people: missing maintainers, patch for generic handling
Message-ID: <20031008032210.GB963@ftbfs.org>
References: <[🔎] E1A6I1O-0001Cp-00@djpigpb.djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1A6I1O-0001Cp-00@djpigpb.djpig.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Kraai <kraai@lafn.org>
Delivered-To: 214289-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:10:38AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> In the Special Maintainers list of cron/people_scripts/people.pl are
> again some maintainer team names missing:
> Debian GNOME Maintainers
> Debian LDP Maintainers
> Debian KDE/Qt Maintainers
>
> Attached is a patch that handles these names in a more generic way
> (untested).
Please ignore my earlier mail.
I've committed this, modulo a change that includes such groups in
the first, rather than second, list.
--
Matt
Reply to: