[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL

I propose something like the following as an addition to the Debian web pages, at the bottom of http://www.debian.org/intro/free. I offer this up for revision and use by the Debian community, or anyone else.

Motivation: some people seem to wish to remain in denial about the project's decision on this matter. This will help their psychological problem. ;-)

<p>The so-called "GNU Free Documentation License" is <em>not</em> a free software license, and accordingly works licensed only under this license cannot generally go into Debian. A tremendous amount of background on why Debian concluded this is available in the <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/";>archives of the debian-legal mailing list</a>. Particularly notable posts and other informative links:
<li>Bruce Perens <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200308/msg00690.html";>clarified</a> that the DFSG is meant to apply to everything on the Debian CD.</li> <li>Branden Robinson ran a survey regarding the freeness of the GFDL, announced <a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200308/msg01031.html";>here</a>.</li> <li>Nathanael Nerode's <a href="http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html>page</a> about some of the problems with the FDL.</li>

OK, so the list of references isn't the best... improve it.  :-)
For starters, I can't find a good, clear one-message explanation of the "technical means" clause problem. And I'd like to point to messages explaining each of the problem examples (reference card, etc.), preferably as few messages as possible. :-)

Reply to: