[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#123771: marked as done (update-excuses info from package pages)



Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:58:55 +0200
with message-id <20030425155855.GJ761@djpig.de>
and subject line It is linked
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2001 02:48:18 +0000
>From grantbow@svpal.svpal.org Wed Dec 12 20:48:17 2001
Return-path: <grantbow@svpal.svpal.org>
Received: from svpal.svpal.org [209.68.147.66] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16ELuz-0000rP-00; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 20:48:17 -0600
Received: from svpal.svpal.org (grantbow@localhost.svpal.org [127.0.0.1])
	by svpal.svpal.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id fBD2ltFo025280;
	Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:47:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from grantbow@localhost)
	by svpal.svpal.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id fBD2lsGc025279;
	Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:47:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 18:47:54 -0800
From: Grant Bowman <grantbow@svpal.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: update-excuses info from package pages
Message-ID: <20011212184754.A24934@svpal.svpal.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.11i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: packages.debian.org

What I do is to look for a package version with 
packages.debian.org/<packagename>.  When I see there is a package in 
unstable that is not in testing yet, I look it up with a plain text 
search in my web browser on the data available at:

	http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html

Can't this information be parsed and generated so that it works similar
to the "list of files", "bug reports" and "dsc" links at the bottom of
every packages web page?  This would be tremendously helpful.

Thanks,

-- 
-- Grant Bowman                                   <grantbow@svpal.org>


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 123771-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2003 15:59:43 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Fri Apr 25 10:59:43 2003
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1995bz-0005NZ-00; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:59:43 -0500
Received: from pd9e399aa.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.153.170] helo=djpig.hell)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35)
	id 1995bv-00049q-00
	for <123771-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:59:41 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1995bG-00088b-00
	for <123771-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:58:58 +0200
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:58:55 +0200
To: 123771-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: It is linked
Message-ID: <20030425155855.GJ761@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 123771-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

#123771: update-excuses info from package pages 

I'm closing this one, since a link exists from the package pages to
packages.qa.d.o which contains the update-excuses output.
(And this bug is tagged moreinfo for more than a year, btw)

Frank

-- 
*** Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> ***
          *** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
          - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/



Reply to: