Bug#133127: Processed: including/excluding tags
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:12:47PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:05:45PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:33:06AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > > Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> > > > > # http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ should gain a couple of rows of checkboxes
> > > > > # to allow including/excluding by tags. See #141968 for instructions.
> > >
> > > The problem with this is that bugreport.cgi seems not to handle
> > > more than one &include (or &exclude) right. It only uses the last
> > > occurence (This is an other behavior as for sev-inc and similar).
> > > You must specify them as &include=patch,wontfix f.e.
> > > But this is not possible with HTML forms, neither with checkboxes nor
> > > lists (<select> with "multiple"). Or does anyone know a way?
> >
> > I see. I'll have a look at fixing that tonight.
>
> Fixed (somewhat belatedly, sorry). I've prepared and tested the
> following patch to webwml; does it look OK, and may I commit it? I've
> used a separate "tag-" namespace for the translated tag names because I
> wasn't sure if it was a good idea to have them colliding with statuses;
> on the other hand the "pending" and "fixed" statuses just mean that the
> respective tags are set, so I could be persuaded otherwise ...
Aren't gettext tags merged anyway in the po file when they contain the same
text?
Frank
--
*** Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> ***
*** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
- http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
Reply to: