Bug#181480: marked as done (libqt3/www-debian.org)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Apr 2003 10:54:16 +0200
with message-id <20030413085416.GB883@djpig.de>
and subject line Bug review
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2003 11:18:52 +0000
>From loos@qt1.iq.usp.br Tue Feb 18 05:18:50 2003
Return-path: <loos@qt1.iq.usp.br>
Received: from 210253.virtua.com.br (michel.net.dhis.org) [200.213.210.253]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18l5ly-0003xA-00; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 05:18:50 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by michel.net.dhis.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18l6hG-0001ct-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:18:02 -0300
Subject: libqt3/www-debian.org
From: Michel Loos <loos@qt1.iq.usp.br>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization:
Message-Id: <1045570681.17532.15.camel@michel.net.dhis.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: 18 Feb 2003 09:18:01 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
The listing of files in libqt3-headers is wrong on the
www.debian.org site.
It is nearly impossible to track down were the headers are:
in /usr/include/qt or /usr/include/qt3 ?
in package libqt3-headers ot libqt3-compat-headers?
--
Michel Loos <loos@qt1.iq.usp.br>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181480-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2003 08:54:24 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Sun Apr 13 03:54:24 2003
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 194dFo-000143-00; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 03:54:24 -0500
Received: from p508399f9.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.153.249] helo=djpig.hell)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 194dFl-0000CX-00
for <181480-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 10:54:21 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.hell with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 194dFg-0000UX-00
for <181480-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 10:54:16 +0200
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 10:54:16 +0200
To: 181480-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug review
Message-ID: <20030413085416.GB883@djpig.de>
References: <20030329184446.GD899@djpig.de> <20030330143219.GB31143@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030330143219.GB31143@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 181480-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:32:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 07:44:46PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > #181480: libqt3/www-debian.org
> > ==============================
> > This was most likely a temporary bug (as Joy's last post already says)
> > Tried to reproduce it and seems to work now. Will close it.
>
> Actually, I left it open because the contents files work that way, they
> simply don't get updated every day.
>
> That doesn't have to do anything with us, but I figured if I left it open,
> people might annoy us with less duplicates. However, no further bugs have
> been filed on this issue, or any comments made to the existing bug.
>
> Submitter, would you mind if we closed this? I seriously doubt you'd get
> any luck if we reassigned the bug to the ftpmasters.
Since the submitter hasn't answered yet, I will close this bug.
The other choice would be to leave it open as a wishlist wontfix
bug. We can consider this, if it get reported again.
So long,
Frank
--
*** Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> ***
*** http://www.djpig.de/ ***
see also: - http://www.usta.de/
- http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/
Reply to: