Bug#160500: marked as done (www.debian.org: dead link in www.debian.org/events/material)
Your message dated Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:51:02 +0200
with message-id <20021006135102.GA9590@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#160500: www.debian.org: isn't fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2002 11:20:54 +0000
>From robertle@semistable.com Wed Sep 11 06:20:53 2002
Return-path: <robertle@semistable.com>
Received: from selenium.one-2-one.net (selenium.webpack.hosteurope.de) [217.115.142.122]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17p5YD-0002Cc-00; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 06:20:53 -0500
Received: from mazerunner (p50804E82.dip.t-dialin.net [80.128.78.130])
by selenium.webpack.hosteurope.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g8BBJh708240
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:19:43 +0200
X-Envelope-To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from robertle by mazerunner with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17p5YX-0000Ch-00; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:21:13 +0700
Subject: www.debian.org: dead link in www.debian.org/events/material
From: "Robert Lemmen" <robertle@semistable.com>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.49
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:21:12 +0700
Message-Id: <E17p5YX-0000Ch-00@mazerunner>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-11
Severity: normal
in http://www.debian.org/events/material the link to posters goes to
http://www.debian.org/events/material/posters/, which doesn't work
robert
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mazerunner 2.4.18 #11 Sun Jul 28 21:03:06 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 160500-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2002 13:50:43 +0000
>From joy@gkvk.hr Sun Oct 06 08:50:43 2002
Return-path: <joy@gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17yBnu-0000VA-00; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 08:50:42 -0500
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17yBoE-0002WU-00; Sun, 06 Oct 2002 15:51:02 +0200
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 15:51:02 +0200
From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
To: Robert Lemmen <robertle@semistable.com>, 160500-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#160500: www.debian.org: isn't fixed
Message-ID: <20021006135102.GA9590@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <[🔎] E17y9QN-0000NO-00@mazerunner> <[🔎] 20021006133550.GB8966@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20021006133550.GB8966@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: 160500-done@bugs.debian.org
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 03:35:50PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Package: www.debian.org
> > Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-06
> > Followup-For: Bug #160500
> >
> > the bug was closed because the problem was fixed. well, it is back ;)
> >
> > i think the *real* problem is that the respective directory is not part
> > of the webwml tree and so the wml files in it are not automatically
> > rebuilt. it is also suboptimal that our server chooses to deliver an
> > index.wml if the directory is requested.
>
> Yeah, we need to decide whether to import that index.wml back into CVS.
> Given how people.debian.org/~akumria, it's previous location, is dead now,
> I'll do this.
>
> In the meantime, reopening the bug.
Oh, that was easy, I had to integrate just a couple of paragraphs.
Thanks for the report.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: