[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: WebSearch Spelling Error



Craig Small said:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 02:30:19PM -0600, xuheng@iastate.edu wrote:
> > The word seperate is misspelled on your website!!
> 
> Excellent! We'll just trawl through the 4 Gigs of files across 8
> websites in 20 languages until we find it!!
> 
> Of course if you want to ruin all our fun you could give us a hint, like
> which page you saw it on and what language it is in.
> 
>   - Craig

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_qdr=all&q=seperate+site%3Awww.debian.org&btnG=Google+Search

=)

(You're right though, of course, xuheng@iastate.edu should have given a
lot more information...)

Culprits: Developer Locations, a few issues of DWN, and the Developer's
Reference.  Lots of hits in the list archives too, but not much we can
do about them ...

Google's cached pages with the search term highlighted:

  http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:y6GPnPpNV54C:www.debian.org/devel/developers.loc.en.html+seperate+site:www.debian.org&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
  http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:IwqhKmfO54UC:www.debian.org/News/weekly/2000/12/mail+seperate+site:www.debian.org&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
  http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:X2SL0lP2650C:www.debian.org/News/weekly/1999/20/mail+seperate+site:www.debian.org&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
  http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:mQu4Y5LQaIUC:www.debian.org/News/weekly/1999/24/mail+seperate+site:www.debian.org&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
  http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:f2o-B9APhnAC:www.debian.org/News/weekly/2002/21/+seperate+site:www.debian.org&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
  http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:TTg1Yir6O8IC:www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html+seperate+site:www.debian.org&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

Andrew.

-- 
Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au>                   http://www.neep.com.au/

"Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Is there?  Well I'd like to meet him.  I could do with a good laugh."



Reply to: