Bug#167164: marked as done (www.debian.org: Pseudo-package listing page lacks debian-policy)
Your message dated Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:28:39 +0100
with message-id <20021031212839.GC12454@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#167164: www.debian.org: Pseudo-package listing page lacks debian-policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2002 23:34:41 +0000
>From fbothamy@mail.dotcom.fr Wed Oct 30 17:34:40 2002
Return-path: <fbothamy@mail.dotcom.fr>
Received: from dyn-212-232-49-240.ppp.tiscali.fr (athena.olympe.fr) [212.232.49.240]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1872MB-000280-00; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:34:39 -0600
Received: from fred by athena.olympe.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1872M5-0003xf-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:34:33 +0100
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:34:33 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Bothamy <fbothamy@mail.dotcom.fr>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: www.debian.org: Pseudo-package listing page lacks debian-policy
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20021030233433.GA11892@athena.olympe.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: <fred@athena.olympe.fr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-31
Severity: minor
I think that the page which lists the pseudo-packages
(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages) should contain the item
"debian policy"
(http://bugs.debian.org/debian-policy).
Fred
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux athena 2.2.20 #1 Sat Nov 3 01:08:10 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167164-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2002 21:27:01 +0000
>From joy@gkvk.hr Thu Oct 31 15:27:00 2002
Return-path: <joy@gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 187MqC-00065L-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:27:00 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 187Mrn-0003Or-00; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:28:39 +0100
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:28:39 +0100
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Bothamy <fbothamy@mail.dotcom.fr>,
167164-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#167164: www.debian.org: Pseudo-package listing page lacks debian-policy
Message-ID: <20021031212839.GC12454@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <[🔎] 20021030233433.GA11892@athena.olympe.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20021030233433.GA11892@athena.olympe.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Josip Rodin <joy@gkvk.hr>
Delivered-To: 167164-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.0 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:34:33AM +0100, Frédéric Bothamy wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-31
> Severity: minor
>
> I think that the page which lists the pseudo-packages
> (http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages) should contain the item
> "debian policy"
> (http://bugs.debian.org/debian-policy).
Oh, but the Policy is actually a real package, it's not a pseudo-package. :)
Please see http://packages.debian.org/debian-policy
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: