Re: Issues with the woody release page/mail
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:43:16AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> First of all we should mention that we also release KDE with woody.
> Thats one of the things the users always asked for - we really should
> mention that.
>
> Another big thing that users always waited for is a replacement for
> dselect. There's now aptitude which is IMO fabulous, deity and lots of
> others. Also worth mentioning somehow.
I'll add these to the web page shortly. Not deity, though, since it's not
available in testing. (No, I have no idea why it is not.) I'll mention
synaptic though.
> Next: If we can manage to produce official CD-Images that feature
> PGI[1] this is also a thing we shouldn't keep secret.
If...
> A question that raised in the thread following my posting there were
> about gcc 3.0 that is mentioned on the release page (and I mentioned in
> my writing there): Someone raised the accuses that using gcc 3.0 would
> produce the same problems like the 2.96 in RH did (binary
> incompatibility). I answered that gcc 3.0 is used only on the new
> architectures that need it foor 2.95 doesn't help there (I hope I didn't
> say something stupid? I'm not too deep into that part). But I guess
> this might also be an issue to mention that gcc-3.0 is only default on
> such architectures that wouldn't work otherwise and the others still
> have gcc 2.95 in the gcc package. At least it showed that some people
> care about it, it should be written down somewhere to not confuse too
> many people.
I'll commit a change to this effect, too.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: