Re: update page
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * James A. Treacy <treacy@debian.org> [2001-11-28 10:26]:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 12:34:37PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> P.S.: In general, it isn't a must for translators to read this list,
> >> unfortunately...
> >
> > While we don't enforce the policy, we do state on the translation pages
> > that translators should subscribe to debian-www.
>
> <nitpick>
> <http://rfc.net/rfc2119.txt> for the difference between MUST and SHOULD
> </nitpick>
>
Please don't lecture me on the proper use of English. I used should and
I meant should. Even using the restrictive definitions from rfc2119 I
feel that should is the proper word. Translators may have
a valid reason for not subscribing to debian-www.
> I personally would see it rather as a MUST at least for the translation
> coordinators.
>
Personally, I don't see the point of stating something must be done when
there is no enforcement, but I could go along with it in the case of
translation coordinators.
I have added the following sentence to english/devel/website/index.wml:
Translation coordinators <strong>MUST</strong> subscribe.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
treacy@debian.org
Reply to: