Please create debian-user-woody list. And- debian-testing archive is broken.
VERY IMPORTANT (IMHO)
I think it would be an excellent idea to have a debian-user-woody list.
The debian-testing is for developers. But I suspect there are many people
(myself included) who are just trying to _use_ woody, and are _not_ developers.
Such a list would help debiam by:
1. Providing a forum for woody _users_ to discuss issues.
perhaps enabling testing debugging to proceed faster since
woody users will have a concise reference place for their concerns
and not have to waste lots of time digging through other places
(such as debian-user, perhaps)
where woody issues are not the primary topic.
2. Keeping debiam-testing from having user traffic,
thus letting it focus on development issues.
I believe this list would be a big time saver for debian-woody users and
help boost the efficiency of the debian project overall.
I hearby request you give this issue serious consideration at
your earliest possible convenience.
Thank you. :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The debian-testing archives have no operational link past April 2001. Yet:
1. I sent the original msg in this thread there several days ago
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2001/debian-user-200109/msg00411.html
and the archives dont have a link for Sept.
2. I am subscribed to the list, and the list is working, because
today a message came to me that had been posted to the list.
(Thanks treacy for pointing me in the right direction for someone to
write to re this matter. :) )
--- "James A. Treacy" <treacy@debian.org> wrote:
> > Also, is the debian-testing list broken? I sent the original message in this
> > thread to that list, but the mailing list page
> > http://lists.debian.org/devel.html
> > lists no messages there later than April! :(
> >
> I will send a message to the listmasters regarding this one.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
Reply to: