Re: Duplicated messages
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 10:02:36AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Is it just me, or does anyone else get all debian-www-cvs messages
> > > > > > > > > three of four times each?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dunno, dupe check filters them out for me anyway.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Same here. Though I did notice that some of the -www-cvs messages were
> > > > > > > coming in late (that is, messages sent earlier come later than those that
> > > > > > > were sent later) recently.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's a common mis-feature of Qmail. If messages are queued instead of
> > > > > > sent out directly, it can take ages to get the Q flushed.
> > > > >
> > > > > But I didn't have any problems with my MTA (that would incite queueing), and
> > > > > it didn't happen before IIRC.
> > > >
> > > > Goor morning, I was talking about murphy, not your mta.
> > >
> > > Good morning, I was talking about murphy, too.
> >
> > So since when is the mta on murphy *your* mta? Did I miss something?
>
> The MTA on murphy would defer and queue messages for me if my MTA wouldn't
> accept the message. Maybe you are referring to something else?
Hmm, apparently, let's waste some time and bandwidth:
a) murphy doesn't deliver mail due to some reason
b) mail gets queued
c) murphy continues delivery
d) new mails will be delivered at once
e) queued mail will only be delivered occasionally
f) new new mail will be delivered at once
g) queued mail will only be delivered occasionally
etc. etc.
So, new mail reaches the recipient at once, old mail will take
ages to get to the recipient.
Regards,
Joey
--
GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."
Reply to: