Bug#72900: marked as done (www.debian.org: cgi-bin/get-copyright and get-changelog CGIs not working properly)
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <20010220211546.I1717@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2000 13:55:57 +0000
>From fer@alfa21.com Sun Oct 01 08:55:57 2000
Return-path: <fer@alfa21.com>
Received: from zeus.alfa21.com (ekans.alfa21-local.com) [::ffff:212.25.133.131]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13fjau-0006uw-00; Sun, 01 Oct 2000 08:55:57 -0500
Received: from zeus.alfa21-local.com (zeus.alfa21-local.com [192.168.1.2])
by ekans.alfa21-local.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBA9136
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:55:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by zeus.alfa21-local.com (Postfix, from userid 1012)
id E0DC84AA87; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:55:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: <fer@alfa21.com>
Subject: www.debian.org: cgi-bin/get-copyright and get-changelog CGIs not working properly
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.6
Message-Id: <20001001135553.E0DC84AA87@zeus.alfa21-local.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:55:53 +0200 (CEST)
Sender: fer@alfa21.com
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20001001
Severity: normal
When I visit one of my packages' page at www.debian.org, CGIs which are
supposed to return some more information about the packages do not return
the expected copyright or changelog file.
For example, when I go to:
http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/text/sablotron.html
there are two links thay say:
View the Debian changelog
View the copyright file
and point, respectively, to:
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/get-changelog?package=sablotron
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/get-copyright?package=sablotron
Following these links will only return something like:
No such changelog file.
or
No such copyright file.
which, of course, is not what people would expect.
I think this is related to Bug#38922 at least.
Regards,
Fernando Sanchez - fer@debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 32214-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2001 20:15:52 +0000
>From joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr Tue Feb 20 14:15:51 2001
Return-path: <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [::ffff:161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14VJCR-00006Z-00; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:15:51 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14VJCM-0000X0-00
for <32214-close@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
To: 32214-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
Message-ID: <20010220211546.I1717@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Delivered-To: 32214-close@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
The CGI script that had pulled the copyright and changelog files, along with
file lists of all packages from the Lintian laboratory has stopped
functioning because the laboratory has been removed.
The links to those scripts have been removed and I am closing the bug
reports related to these scripts. We will implement something of the sort
again, eventually. If anyone wants to submit a wishlist bug to get this
functionality back, you can, but we're already well aware of the issue so
I wouldn't bother. :|
Sorry. :/
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: