Re: moving packages.d.o to klecker
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 08:33:48PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, James A. Treacy wrote:
>
> > Are there any reasons we shouldn't move packages.d.o over to
> > klecker? klecker is a much faster machine and I believe it
> > has better bandwidth.
>
> It seems to me auric would be a better choice. Of course the reason to do
> that is to integrate it with the pools DB so it has really nice data,
> etc..
>
Do you have any more information on the pools db? One thing
that really needs to be fixed is how we provide access to
copyright, changelog (both debian and upstream) and file
listings for packages. Perhaps the db could carry this
information.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
treacy@debian.org
Reply to: