Re: glimpse version on lists.d.o
Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> writes:
> However, we were using 4.1 so far... and 3.0 and 3.6 are also non-free just
> a bit more free. What's this note about then? :)
At one point, the archive search was using 3.x, which I thought was
free. 4.x was more stable or had some feature I really wanted (I
don't remember), so I switched to that, but I was disappointed about
the new license. You say that 3.x isn't free either? You're probably
right if you've just read the license. Feel free to edit this bit in
the readme to make it more clear.
Guy
Reply to: