Re: -D CUR_LOCALE considered harmful (was: webwml failed)

To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: -D CUR_LOCALE considered harmful (was: webwml failed)
From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:50:47 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010610145047.G6607@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010610144558.F6607@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>; from joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de on Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 02:45:58PM +0200
References: <E1594G9-0002H7-00@klecker.debian.org> <[🔎] 20010610144558.F6607@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

Martin Schulze wrote:
> -D CUR_LOCALE=fi_FI considered harmful.

Same for norwegian and swedish btw.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
This is Linux Country.  On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.

Reply to:

References:
- -D CUR_LOCALE considered harmful (was: webwml failed)
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

Prev by Date: New Makefile in i18n/l10n broken (was: webwml failed)
Next by Date: Re: Translating "Debian Weekly News"
Previous by thread: Re: -D CUR_LOCALE considered harmful (was: webwml failed)
Next by thread: New Makefile in i18n/l10n broken (was: webwml failed)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread