I agree with Marcin, this patch should be applied, and maybe the pointed
page updated. It is named "unstable.html", and speaks about woody.
ie, an english speaker should make a release/sid.wml file so that it could
be used where we need it. After that, releases/index.wml could be also
updated to point to the unstable page.
Sorry, I'm so unsure of my english that I can't even try to do that...
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:50:58PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Shouldn't this patch be applied to packages.wml, so that it has
> a consistent view? Or was that left out on purpose?
> Marcin Owsiany <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216
> --- packages.wml~ Mon Jan 8 22:35:44 2001
> +++ packages.wml Tue Jan 9 21:46:46 2001
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
> <DD>This area contains packages that haven't had sufficient testing or
> have severe bugs (some that might even cause damage to your system).</DD>
> + <P>See the <a href="$(HOME)/releases/unstable/">unstable release pages</A>
> + for more information.
> <P>Note that same packages might appear in several distributions, but with
- From: Marcin Owsiany <email@example.com>