Re: packages.wml

[Martin Quinson <Martin.Quinson@ens-lyon.fr>]

Hello, 

I agree with Marcin, this patch should be applied, and maybe the pointed
page updated. It is named "unstable.html", and speaks about woody.

ie, an english speaker should make a release/sid.wml file so that it could
be used where we need it. After that, releases/index.wml could be also
updated to point to the unstable page.

Sorry, I'm so unsure of my english that I can't even try to do that...

Bye, Mt.

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:50:58PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Shouldn't this patch be applied to packages.wml, so that it has
> a consistent view? Or was that left out on purpose?
> 
> regards
> 
> Marcin
> -- 
> Marcin Owsiany <porridge@pandora.info.bielsko.pl>
> http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porridge/
> GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216

> --- packages.wml~	Mon Jan  8 22:35:44 2001
> +++ packages.wml	Tue Jan  9 21:46:46 2001
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
>    <DD>This area contains packages that haven't had sufficient testing or
>    have severe bugs (some that might even cause damage to your system).</DD>
>  
> +  <P>See the <a href="$(HOME)/releases/unstable/">unstable release pages</A>
> +  for more information.
> +
>  </DL>
>  
>  <P>Note that same packages might appear in several distributions, but with