Bug#75490: marked as done (broken links on http://www.debian.org/doc/)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:48:29 +0200
with message-id <20001024194829.B2935@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#75490: broken links on http://www.debian.org/doc/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2000 16:14:42 +0000
>From m_kraai@gecko23.dse.beckman.com Tue Oct 24 11:14:41 2000
Return-path: <m_kraai@gecko23.dse.beckman.com>
Received: from svfulraptor1.beckman.com (svfulraptor1.dp.beckman.com) [::ffff:134.217.237.30]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13o6in-0000nn-00; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:14:41 -0500
Received: from gecko23.dse.beckman.com by svfulraptor1.dp.beckman.com
via smtpd (for master.debian.org [216.234.231.5]) with SMTP; 24 Oct 2000 16:16:00 UT
Received: (from m_kraai@localhost) by gecko23.dse.beckman.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.1) id JAA02872 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:13:38 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.carnegiemellon.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: broken links on http://www.debian.org/doc/
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20001024091338.E2630@gecko23.dse.beckman.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.9i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
The Documentation page contains a link to the Linux HOWTO's which no
longer works. It points to http://www.linux.org/help/howto.html . The
Linux Documentation Project HOWTO information is available at
http://www.linuxdoc.org/docs.html#howto .
Also, it appears that the Linux Kernel Hacker's Guide,
http://www.redhat.com:8080/HyperNews/get/khg.html , is a dead link. It
appears to have been replicated at
http://www.linuxdoc.org/LDP/khg/HyperNews/get/khg.html .
Matt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 75490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2000 17:44:08 +0000
>From joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr Tue Oct 24 12:44:08 2000
Return-path: <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [::ffff:161.53.211.3]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13o87L-00085j-00; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:44:08 -0500
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13o8BZ-0000mL-00; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:48:29 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 19:48:29 +0200
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
To: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.carnegiemellon.edu>,
75490-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#75490: broken links on http://www.debian.org/doc/
Message-ID: <20001024194829.B2935@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <[🔎] 20001024091338.E2630@gecko23.dse.beckman.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20001024091338.E2630@gecko23.dse.beckman.com>; from kraai@alumni.carnegiemellon.edu on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:13:38AM -0700
Delivered-To: 75490-done@bugs.debian.org
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 09:13:38AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
>
> The Documentation page contains a link to the Linux HOWTO's which no
> longer works. It points to http://www.linux.org/help/howto.html . The
> Linux Documentation Project HOWTO information is available at
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/docs.html#howto .
>
> Also, it appears that the Linux Kernel Hacker's Guide,
> http://www.redhat.com:8080/HyperNews/get/khg.html , is a dead link. It
> appears to have been replicated at
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/LDP/khg/HyperNews/get/khg.html .
Fixed in CVS, thanks.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: