[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#36927: marked as done (www.debian.org: Wrong info on Germany's JF Lehmanns)



Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:56:47 +1100
with message-id <20001018075647.D5447@eye-net.com.au>
and subject line vendor updated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 1999 02:41:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 31001 invoked from network); 30 Apr 1999 02:41:37 -0000
Received: from mail.ilk.de (root@194.121.104.8)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 1999 02:41:37 -0000
Received: from sanctum (pool11.ka.ilk.de [194.122.84.11])
	by mail.ilk.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA00605
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:41:33 +0200
Received: from jae by sanctum with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
	id 10d3F6-00079O-00; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:41:32 +0200
From: "Juergen A. Erhard" <jae@ilk.de>
Subject: www.debian.org: Wrong info on Germany's JF Lehmanns
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <E10d3F6-00079O-00@sanctum>
Sender: "Juergen A. Erhard" <jae@jae.ddns.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 04:41:32 +0200

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A

I recently (yesterday) checked on them (out of curiosity), and what
the advertise as Debian obviously includes non-free.

I cannot tell whether they use the official CD images for the package...

Please correct this (add + non-free to their entry)

Thanks,

Bye, J

PS: I have written to Lehmann's... IMNSHO, they do not separate non-free
enough (as in: at all).  I'm waiting for a reply.  (No, I have clearly
stated that I am *not* speaking for the Debian project...)

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux sanctum 2.2.4 #2 Thu Apr 15 20:11:07 CEST 1999 i686 unknown

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 36927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2000 20:56:50 +0000
>From csmall@eye-net.com.au Tue Oct 17 15:56:50 2000
Return-path: <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
Received: from gonzo.eye-net.com.au [::ffff:203.41.228.17] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 13ldmz-0006HI-00; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:56:50 -0500
Received: by gonzo.eye-net.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B5174C5CC; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:56:47 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:56:47 +1100
To: 36927-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: vendor updated
Message-ID: <20001018075647.D5447@eye-net.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
Delivered-To: 36927-done@bugs.debian.org

this is an ancient bug, updated this vendor several times, closing.

  
-- 
Craig Small VK2XLZ  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/        <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org>                 Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>



Reply to: