Bug#23350: marked as done (www.debian.org: adding download support)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:57:18 +1100
with message-id <20001018075718.E5447@eye-net.com.au>
and subject line old
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 1998 17:18:17 +0000
Received: (qmail 23361 invoked from network); 9 Jun 1998 17:18:16 -0000
Received: from server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (192.129.16.1)
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 9 Jun 1998 17:18:16 -0000
Received: from isis.pi.fho-emden.de (ppp005asc.fho-emden.de [193.174.117.5]) by server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA11800 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 19:18:02 +0200
Received: (from koptein@localhost)
by isis.pi.fho-emden.de (8.9.0/8.9.0/Debian/GNU) id RAA00775;
Tue, 9 Jun 1998 17:28:07 +0200
Message-ID: <19980609172807.B490@isis>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 17:28:07 +0200
From: Hartmut Koptein <koptein@et-inf.fho-emden.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: www.debian.org: adding download support
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Before or short after hamm is released, it should be possible to download binaries
(deb packages) also for m68k and other arch-types.
This give us one problem: should all packages have the same release number?
If say alpha has foo_7.6-23 and i386 (or ia32) has foo_7.6-19, should both
packages are downloadable or only the newer one? What about packages, that
aren't released for one arch and not for the other (or it is only available
for one arch and not for all)?
This must be checked for each update of www.debian.org and if a package isn't
available the download-button must be disabled. And for an older release
the user should be warned.
Thanks,
Hartmut
--
Hartmut Koptein EMail:
Friedrich-van-Senden-Str. 7 koptein@et-inf.fho-emden.de
26603 Aurich
Tel.: +49-4941-10390 koptein@debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 21620-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2000 20:57:22 +0000
>From csmall@eye-net.com.au Tue Oct 17 15:57:22 2000
Return-path: <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
Received: from gonzo.eye-net.com.au [::ffff:203.41.228.17]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13ldnV-0006Jy-00; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 15:57:22 -0500
Received: by gonzo.eye-net.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BA8D9C5CC; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:57:18 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:57:18 +1100
To: 21620-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: old
Message-ID: <20001018075718.E5447@eye-net.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
Delivered-To: 21620-done@bugs.debian.org
we dont do hamm anymore, we do have different arches now.
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: