Bug#62804: marked as done (outdated prospective packages website)
Your message dated Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:25:14 +0200
with message-id <20000421202513.B10989@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
and subject line Bug#62804: outdated prospective packages website
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2000 18:14:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 24747 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2000 18:14:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO davinci.tron.priv.at) (195.202.175.174)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2000 18:14:43 -0000
Received: by davinci.tron.priv.at (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 13375A7B5; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:15:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Othmar Pasteka <pasteka@kabsi.at>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: outdated prospective packages website
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:15:53 +0200
Message-Id: <20000421181553.13375A7B5@davinci.tron.priv.at>
Sender: othmar@tron.priv.at
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2000-04-21
Severity: normal
hi,
i just looked for offered packages on the Prospective Packages site and
looked at sysutils. and well, what did i find out? it was taken and already
uploaded to frozen ... so it would be nice if this document stays current
that people don't put effort in packages which are already taken.
thanks and so long
Othmar
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux davinci 2.2.14 #4 Tue Apr 4 00:40:42 CEST 2000 i586
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 62804-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2000 18:26:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 2359 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2000 18:26:27 -0000
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr (mail@161.53.211.3)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2000 18:26:27 -0000
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 12ii78-0002rp-00; Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:25:14 +0200
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:25:14 +0200
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
To: Othmar Pasteka <pasteka@kabsi.at>, 62804-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: wnpp@debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#62804: outdated prospective packages website
Message-ID: <20000421202513.B10989@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
References: <20000421181553.13375A7B5@davinci.tron.priv.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <20000421181553.13375A7B5@davinci.tron.priv.at>
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:15:53PM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> i just looked for offered packages on the Prospective Packages site and
> looked at sysutils. and well, what did i find out? it was taken and already
> uploaded to frozen ... so it would be nice if this document stays current
> that people don't put effort in packages which are already taken.
I've updated the WNPP with this information, thanks.
In future please contact wnpp@debian.org instead.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: